Skip to main content
Ranking · Data 2015–2026 · Source: BFS

Municipalities in Zurich that most often vote against the Swiss result

Fischenthal is the municipality in Zurich that most often ends up on the opposite side of the national result: on 34.3% of federal ballot proposals (2015–2026) its own majority differed from Switzerland. Next are Bauma (30.4%) and Hagenbuch (29.4%). Only municipalities of at least 1,000 residents are counted. Source: FSO.

Ranking

BFS · 2015–2026
RankMunicipalityDivergenceResidents
1Fischenthal34.3%2'697
2Bauma30.4%5'109
3Hagenbuch29.4%1'168
4Thalheim an der Thur27.5%1'024
5Weiach26.7%2'133
6Höri26.5%3'676
7Trüllikon25.5%1'132
8Oberembrach25.5%1'132
9Bäretswil24.5%5'137
10Wila24.5%2'201
11Wildberg24.5%1'019
12Marthalen23.8%2'027
13Flaach23.5%1'572
14Zurich22.5%440'935
15Rifferswil21.6%1'213
16Neerach21.6%3'348
17Stadel bei Niederglatt21.6%2'500
18Turbenthal20.6%5'369
19Kleinandelfingen19.6%2'278
20Buch am Irchel18.6%1'068
21Wil18.6%1'595
22Grüningen18.6%3'931
23Dinhard18.6%1'734
24Hochfelden17.8%2'019
25Kappel am Albis17.6%1'375
26Russikon17.6%4'687
27Nürensdorf16.7%5'858
28Dällikon16.7%4'469
29Niederglatt16.7%5'513
30Seegräben16.7%1'486
31Hittnau16.7%3'974
32Winterthur16.7%120'741
33Boppelsen15.7%1'439
34Ellikon an der Thur15.7%1'027
35Laufen-Uhwiesen14.7%1'848
36Schöfflisdorf14.7%1'420
37Gossau14.7%10'621
38Hinwil14.7%11'949
39Geroldswil14.7%5'402
40Andelfingen14.7%3'719
41Henggart13.7%2'376
42Rheinau13.7%1'334
43Glattfelden13.7%5'555
44Dänikon13.7%1'861
45Erlenbach13.7%5'679
46Küsnacht13.7%15'250
47Oetwil am See13.7%5'190
48Zumikon13.7%5'781
49Seuzach13.7%7'990
50Zell13.7%6'855
51Oetwil an der Limmat13.7%2'604
52Uitikon13.7%5'749
53Stammheim13.7%2'970
54Hüntwangen12.7%1'142
55Niederhasli12.7%9'842
56Oberglatt12.7%7'741
57Rümlang12.7%8'363
58Wald12.7%10'686
59Weisslingen12.7%3'464
60Hettlingen12.7%3'208
61Unterengstringen12.7%4'361
62Rafz11.9%4'792
63Flurlingen11.8%1'505
64Lufingen11.8%2'870
65Winkel11.8%5'117
66Oberweningen11.8%1'903
67Steinmaur11.8%3'758
68Bubikon11.8%7'690
69Dürnten11.8%8'030
70Kilchberg11.8%9'576
71Rüschlikon11.8%6'449
72Herrliberg11.8%6'802
73Aesch11.8%1'644
74Dägerlen11%1'204
75Rorbas10.9%3'078
76Mettmenstetten10.8%5'841
77Ossingen10.8%1'859
78Embrach10.8%10'415
79Buchs10.8%6'814
80Dielsdorf10.8%6'817
81Regensdorf10.8%20'701
82Zollikon10.8%13'737
83Lindau10.8%5'896
84Elgg10.8%5'241
85Wiesendangen9.9%6'852
86Hedingen9.8%3'983
87Freienstein-Teufen9.8%2'373
88Meilen9.8%14'952
89Uster9.8%37'031
90Volketswil9.8%19'948
91Brütten9.8%2'277
92Neftenbach9.8%5'780
93Pfungen9.8%4'170
94Weiningen9.8%5'204
95Aeugst am Albis8.9%2'003
96Hausen am Albis8.9%3'956
97Wettswil am Albis8.8%5'419
98Hombrechtikon8.8%9'252
99Stäfa8.8%15'232
100Uetikon am See8.8%6'744
101Pfäffikon8.8%12'881
102Egg8.8%8'757
103Fällanden8.8%9'634
104Elsau8.8%3'957
105Rickenbach8.8%2'895
106Birmensdorf8.8%7'587
107Stallikon7.9%3'903
108Bonstetten7.8%5'659
109Bachenbülach7.8%4'450
110Eglisau7.8%5'794
111Adliswil7.8%19'904
112Langnau am Albis7.8%8'097
113Oberrieden7.8%5'410
114Richterswil7.8%14'545
115Thalwil7.8%18'835
116Männedorf7.8%11'764
117Greifensee7.8%5'401
118Maur7.8%10'873
119Mönchaltorf7.8%4'446
120Wangen-Brüttisellen7.8%8'289
121Schlieren7.8%20'474
122Horgen7.8%24'641
123Knonau6.9%2'515
124Obfelden6.9%6'081
125Ottenbach6.9%3'038
126Dachsen6.9%1'896
127Feuerthalen6.9%3'893
128Dietlikon6.9%8'033
129Otelfingen6.9%2'861
130Schwerzenbach6.9%5'256
131Wallisellen5.9%17'811
132Niederweningen5.9%3'284
133Fehraltorf5.9%6'943
134Dübendorf5.9%33'214
135Dietikon5.9%28'325
136Wädenswil5.9%26'012
137Affoltern am Albis4.9%12'911
138Rüti4.9%13'144
139Wetzikon4.9%27'317
140Urdorf4.9%10'539
141Bassersdorf3.9%12'358
142Kloten3.9%22'017
143Opfikon3.9%21'462
144Oberengstringen3.9%7'076
145Illnau-Effretikon3.9%17'973
146Bülach2.9%24'590
Popular votes (sd-t-17-02) 2015–2026 · Federal Statistical Office (FSO), retrieved 28.09.2026

How we measure this

BFS

Share of federal ballot proposals (2015–2026) on which the municipality's own majority landed on the opposite side of the Swiss-wide result (yes vs no). Based on the FSO ballot results across every proposal in the period; only municipalities that took part in at least 50 proposals are ranked. Municipal ties (exactly 50%) count neither for nor against. Only municipalities of at least 1,000 residents appear: in very small municipalities a few votes can flip the majority, so genuine political distinctiveness could not be reliably separated from chance. The top ranks are nonetheless not an artefact — the municipalities involved diverge deeply (around 20 percentage points) and in a consistent direction, not narrowly and at random.

Frequently asked questions

Which municipality in Zurich votes against Switzerland most often?
Fischenthal: on 34.3% of federal ballot proposals (2015–2026) its majority landed on the opposite side of the national result — the highest in Zurich (municipalities of 1,000+ residents).
Aren't these just small villages with random results?
No. That is why only municipalities of at least 1,000 residents are counted, and the leaders diverge not narrowly but sharply — on average about 20 percentage points from the 50% line, and systematically in the same direction (they reject what Switzerland accepts). That is a real political pattern, not the statistical noise of a few ballots.