Skip to main content
Ranking · Data swissALTIRegio 2026 · Source: BFS

The steepest municipalities in canton Fribourg

National ranking →

Jaun is the steepest municipality in canton Fribourg: its terrain averages 28.5° of slope. Next come Haut-Intyamon (26.3°) and Bas-Intyamon (26.1°). This is the mean gradient across the whole municipal area, measured on a 40 m elevation grid — a figure for ordering, not an absolute gradient. Source: swisstopo swissALTIRegio 2026.

Ranking

swisstopo · swissALTIRegio 2026
RankMunicipalityMean slopeResidents
1Jaun28.5°659
2Haut-Intyamon26.3°1'772
3Bas-Intyamon26.1°1'759
4Grandvillard25.9°925
5Val-de-Charmey24.3°2'725
6Crésuz22.8°508
7Châtel-sur-Montsalvens21.9°354
8Broc20.3°2'957
9Plaffeien19.1°3'729
10Gruyères19°2'353
11Botterens16.8°748
12Plasselb16.8°1'099
13Châtel-Saint-Denis16.2°8'931
14La Roche15.9°2'083
15Corbières13.6°1'037
16Semsales12.2°1'591
17Treyvaux11.8°1'643
18Hauteville11.6°750
19Le Mouret11°3'326
20St. Silvester10.6°1'062
21Fribourg10.1°39'599
22Villarsel-sur-Marly9.6°71
23Ueberstorf9.6°2'417
24Giffers9.5°1'718
25Prévondavaux9.3°108
26Le Pâquier9.3°1'457
27Pont-la-Ville9.2°649
28Sorens9.2°1'125
29Surpierre8.9°1'259
30Granges8.9°1'012
31Pont-en-Ogoz8.8°2'050
32Brünisried8.7°738
33Heitenried8.4°1'413
34Tafers8.4°8'030
35Le Châtelard8.2°362
36Bois-d’Amont8°2'489
37Remaufens7.9°1'462
38Châtillon7.8°549
39Rue7.8°2'638
40Marly7.8°9'566
41Massonnens7.7°605
42Gibloux7.7°8'719
43Rechthalten7.7°1'161
44St. Ursen7.6°1'389
45Grangettes7.5°214
46Vaulruz7.5°1'115
47Vuadens7.5°2'580
48Bulle FR7.4°27'276
49Pierrafortscha7.4°148
50Ursy7.3°4'073
51Granges-Paccot7.2°3'989
52Villorsonnens7.1°1'593
53Hauterive7.1°2'674
54Attalens7.1°3'690
55Montagny7°3'105
56Courtepin6.9°5'847
57Ferpicloz6.7°242
58Neyruz6.6°2'874
59Villars-sur-Glâne6.6°12'644
60Schmitten6.6°4'303
61Wünnewil-Flamatt6.6°5'848
62Courgevaux6.5°1'431
63Nuvilly6.4°493
64Les Montets6.3°1'587
65La Sonnaz6.3°1'481
66Saint-Martin6.2°1'059
67Siviriez6.1°2'711
68Le Flon6.1°1'221
69Echarlens6°823
70Riaz6°2'924
71Belfaux6°3'488
72Tentlingen6°1'374
73Lully5.9°1'239
74Autigny5.9°837
75Matran5.8°2'094
76Marsens5.7°2'093
77Prez5.7°2'487
78Châtonnaye5.5°852
79Vuisternens-devant-Romont5.5°2'410
80Torny5.5°1'112
81Cottens5.5°1'605
82La Verrerie5.5°1'323
83Belmont-Broye5.4°6'287
84Misery-Courtion5.4°2'393
85Corminboeuf5.3°3'120
86Cugy5.2°2'067
87Bösingen5.2°3'336
88Billens-Hennens5.1°910
89Mézières5.1°1'217
90Grolley-Ponthaux5.1°2'898
91Kleinbösingen5.1°698
92Romont5°6'276
93Avry4.9°1'970
94Chénens4.9°908
95Düdingen4.9°9'333
96Villaz4.7°2'421
97Morlon4.7°790
98Cressier4.7°1'120
99Sâles4.5°1'478
100Givisiez4.4°3'507
101Gurmels4.3°4'710
102La Brillaz4.1°2'239
103Mont-Vully4°4'551
104Bossonnens4°1'661
105Fétigny-Ménières4°—
106Cheyres-Châbles3.5°2'545
107Murten3.3°9'525
108Ried bei Kerzers3.3°1'285
109Fräschels3.2°435
110Vallon2.6°537
111Kerzers2.5°5'546
112Saint-Aubin2.4°2'106
113Estavayer2.4°10'812
114Sévaz1.6°324
115Delley-Portalban1.4°1'349
116Gletterens1.1°1'156
117Greng0.8°179
118Meyriez0.7°586
119Muntelier0.4°1'020
swissALTIRegio 2026 · swisstopo, retrieved 28.08.2026

How we measure this

swisstopo

The mean slope of the terrain in degrees, averaged over the whole municipal area from the swisstopo swissALTIRegio digital elevation model at 40 m resolution (swissALTIRegio 2026). Two caveats matter. First, it describes the entire territory, not the inhabited settlement — a municipality can be steep overall while its village sits on flat ground. Second, slope depends on the grid it is measured at: at 40 m the figures run a few percent gentler than a 10 m grid, so use them to order municipalities, not as an absolute gradient. Steep terrain and large vertical range tend to coincide; see the greatest-vertical-range ranking.

Frequently asked questions

Which municipality in canton Fribourg has the steepest terrain?
Jaun, whose terrain averages 28.5° of slope (swissALTIRegio 2026) — the steepest of any municipality in canton Fribourg, measured on the swisstopo 40 m elevation grid.
Why is the slope measured at 40 m?
Slope depends on the resolution of the elevation grid it is computed from. These figures use the swisstopo 40 m grid, which is stable and comparable across all municipalities; a finer 10 m grid would read a few percent steeper. The ranking order is reliable, but the degree value is not an absolute gradient.

Related rankings