Skip to main content
Ranking · Data 2015–2026 · Source: BFS

Municipalities in Lucerne that most often vote against the Swiss result

Hasle is the municipality in Lucerne that most often ends up on the opposite side of the national result: on 36.6% of federal ballot proposals (2015–2026) its own majority differed from Switzerland. Next are Escholzmatt-Marbach (32.4%) and Flühli (31.4%). Only municipalities of at least 1,000 residents are counted. Source: FSO.

Ranking

BFS · 2015–2026
RankMunicipalityDivergenceResidents
1Hasle36.6%1'841
2Escholzmatt-Marbach32.4%4'587
3Flühli31.4%1'918
4Luthern30.7%1'252
5Entlebuch30.4%3'409
6Werthenstein29.4%2'161
7Hergiswil bei Willisau28.4%1'934
8Aesch26.5%1'526
9Schongau25.5%1'055
10Rickenbach25.5%3'887
11Menznau25.5%3'168
12Zell22.8%2'264
13Schüpfheim22.5%4'287
14Hohenrain22.5%2'467
15Römerswil22.5%1'804
16Pfaffnau22.5%2'792
17Ermensee20.8%1'087
18Schwarzenberg20.8%1'808
19Grosswangen20.6%3'492
20Altbüron20.6%1'013
21Reiden20.6%7'690
22Büron19.8%2'759
23Triengen18.6%5'051
24Wolhusen18.6%4'868
25Gisikon17.6%1'543
26Lucerne17.6%86'699
27Ettiswil17.6%2'877
28Ballwil16.7%2'845
29Dagmersellen16.7%6'144
30Wauwil16.7%2'683
31Hitzkirch15.7%6'067
32Vitznau15.7%1'492
33Ruswil15.7%7'645
34Altishofen15.7%2'040
35Wikon15.7%1'491
36Buttisholz14.9%3'510
37Rain14.7%3'347
38Greppen13.9%1'228
39Inwil13.7%2'919
40Meggen13.7%7'718
41Weggis13.7%4'874
42Beromünster13.7%6'963
43Hildisrieden13.7%2'468
44Schenkon13.7%3'163
45Nebikon13.7%2'959
46Schötz13.7%4'983
47Meierskappel12.7%1'578
48Egolzwil12.7%1'667
49Willisau12.7%9'297
50Malters11.8%7'930
51Knutwil11.8%2'499
52Sempach11.8%4'404
53Eschenbach10.8%3'796
54Root10.8%6'712
55Eich10.8%1'779
56Nottwil10.8%4'104
57Geuensee10%3'069
58Hochdorf9.8%10'158
59Dierikon9.8%1'691
60Udligenswil9.8%2'483
61Mauensee9.8%1'533
62Rothenburg8.8%7'983
63Adligenswil8.8%5'704
64Buchrain8.8%7'013
65Neuenkirch8.8%7'243
66Oberkirch8.8%5'213
67Sursee7.8%11'118
68Horw6.9%15'939
69Ebikon4.9%14'737
70Emmen3.9%32'777
71Kriens3.9%30'685
Popular votes (sd-t-17-02) 2015–2026 · Federal Statistical Office (FSO), retrieved 28.09.2026

How we measure this

BFS

Share of federal ballot proposals (2015–2026) on which the municipality's own majority landed on the opposite side of the Swiss-wide result (yes vs no). Based on the FSO ballot results across every proposal in the period; only municipalities that took part in at least 50 proposals are ranked. Municipal ties (exactly 50%) count neither for nor against. Only municipalities of at least 1,000 residents appear: in very small municipalities a few votes can flip the majority, so genuine political distinctiveness could not be reliably separated from chance. The top ranks are nonetheless not an artefact — the municipalities involved diverge deeply (around 20 percentage points) and in a consistent direction, not narrowly and at random.

Frequently asked questions

Which municipality in Lucerne votes against Switzerland most often?
Hasle: on 36.6% of federal ballot proposals (2015–2026) its majority landed on the opposite side of the national result — the highest in Lucerne (municipalities of 1,000+ residents).
Aren't these just small villages with random results?
No. That is why only municipalities of at least 1,000 residents are counted, and the leaders diverge not narrowly but sharply — on average about 20 percentage points from the 50% line, and systematically in the same direction (they reject what Switzerland accepts). That is a real political pattern, not the statistical noise of a few ballots.