The greatest solar potential in canton Lucerne
National ranking →Lucerne has the greatest solar-energy potential in canton Lucerne: its roofs could generate about 253 GWh of electricity a year. Next come Emmen (177 GWh) and Kriens (108 GWh). This is modelled roof potential — largest where there is the most roof area, not current generation. Source: BFE.
Ranking
BFE · 2025| Rank | Municipality | Roof potential | Residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lucerne | 253 GWh | 85'534 |
| 2 | Emmen | 177 GWh | 32'380 |
| 3 | Kriens | 108 GWh | 29'632 |
| 4 | Willisau | 105 GWh | 9'149 |
| 5 | Beromünster | 90 GWh | 6'714 |
| 6 | Ruswil | 89 GWh | 7'472 |
| 7 | Sursee | 87 GWh | 10'810 |
| 8 | Hochdorf | 80 GWh | 10'033 |
| 9 | Reiden | 79 GWh | 7'492 |
| 10 | Rothenburg | 77 GWh | 7'828 |
| 11 | Hitzkirch | 74 GWh | 6'030 |
| 12 | Dagmersellen | 68 GWh | 5'878 |
| 13 | Ebikon | 67 GWh | 14'662 |
| 14 | Malters | 66 GWh | 7'771 |
| 15 | Escholzmatt-Marbach | 64 GWh | 4'474 |
| 16 | Root | 62 GWh | 5'727 |
| 17 | Neuenkirch | 61 GWh | 7'222 |
| 18 | Triengen | 59 GWh | 4'811 |
| 19 | Horw | 54 GWh | 15'475 |
| 20 | Schüpfheim | 52 GWh | 4'251 |
| 21 | Menznau | 50 GWh | 3'113 |
| 22 | Buttisholz | 47 GWh | 3'504 |
| 23 | Schötz | 46 GWh | 4'924 |
| 24 | Grosswangen | 46 GWh | 3'450 |
| 25 | Entlebuch | 45 GWh | 3'387 |
| 26 | Hohenrain | 42 GWh | 2'452 |
| 27 | Meggen | 41 GWh | 7'771 |
| 28 | Rickenbach | 40 GWh | 3'695 |
| 29 | Pfaffnau | 39 GWh | 2'784 |
| 30 | Buchrain | 38 GWh | 6'782 |
| 31 | Oberkirch | 38 GWh | 5'077 |
| 32 | Weggis | 36 GWh | 4'644 |
| 33 | Altishofen | 36 GWh | 2'018 |
| 34 | Inwil | 36 GWh | 2'919 |
| 35 | Eschenbach | 35 GWh | 3'806 |
| 36 | Flühli | 35 GWh | 1'821 |
| 37 | Sempach | 34 GWh | 4'160 |
| 38 | Zell | 33 GWh | 2'162 |
| 39 | Nottwil | 32 GWh | 4'149 |
| 40 | Ettiswil | 31 GWh | 2'878 |
| 41 | Wolhusen | 31 GWh | 4'561 |
| 42 | Adligenswil | 31 GWh | 5'621 |
| 43 | Ballwil | 30 GWh | 2'821 |
| 44 | Werthenstein | 30 GWh | 2'199 |
| 45 | Rain | 30 GWh | 3'129 |
| 46 | Römerswil | 29 GWh | 1'789 |
| 47 | Hergiswil bei Willisau | 28 GWh | 1'928 |
| 48 | Knutwil | 28 GWh | 2'460 |
| 49 | Büron | 27 GWh | 2'746 |
| 50 | Wikon | 27 GWh | 1'509 |
| 51 | Nebikon | 27 GWh | 2'817 |
| 52 | Luthern | 26 GWh | 1'265 |
| 53 | Schenkon | 26 GWh | 3'130 |
| 54 | Hildisrieden | 26 GWh | 2'468 |
| 55 | Hasle | 25 GWh | 1'794 |
| 56 | Schongau | 21 GWh | 1'061 |
| 57 | Wauwil | 21 GWh | 2'599 |
| 58 | Geuensee | 19 GWh | 2'900 |
| 59 | Udligenswil | 19 GWh | 2'480 |
| 60 | Egolzwil | 19 GWh | 1'661 |
| 61 | Ufhusen | 18 GWh | 936 |
| 62 | Schwarzenberg | 18 GWh | 1'792 |
| 63 | Aesch | 18 GWh | 1'405 |
| 64 | Dierikon | 18 GWh | 1'665 |
| 65 | Eich | 17 GWh | 1'669 |
| 66 | Altbüron | 16 GWh | 1'032 |
| 67 | Mauensee | 15 GWh | 1'532 |
| 68 | Grossdietwil | 15 GWh | 904 |
| 69 | Meierskappel | 14 GWh | 1'580 |
| 70 | Ermensee | 14 GWh | 1'032 |
| 71 | Fischbach | 12 GWh | 731 |
| 72 | Romoos | 12 GWh | 652 |
| 73 | Schlierbach | 12 GWh | 988 |
| 74 | Roggliswil | 11 GWh | 789 |
| 75 | Vitznau | 10 GWh | 1'430 |
| 76 | Alberswil | 10 GWh | 728 |
| 77 | Doppleschwand | 8 GWh | 830 |
| 78 | Gisikon | 7 GWh | 1'503 |
| 79 | Greppen | 6 GWh | 1'201 |
How we measure this
BFEModelled annual electricity that rooftop photovoltaics could produce across the whole municipality, in gigawatt-hours per year, from the BFE «Solarenergiepotenziale der Schweizer Gemeinden» model (2025 snapshot). It is a potential, not installed capacity or actual generation, and it scales with roof area — so large towns lead simply because they have more roofs. It is a rolling model snapshot, not an annual survey. The companion roofs-plus-façades scenario adds vertical surfaces.
Frequently asked questions
- Which municipality in canton Lucerne has the greatest solar potential?
- Lucerne, whose roofs could generate about 253 GWh of electricity a year (2025) — the greatest modelled roof potential of any municipality in canton Lucerne.
- Does this mean the municipality actually produces this much solar power?
- No. It is the modelled potential of the available roof surfaces — the electricity they could generate if fully used. Actual installed photovoltaics produce far less. The figure comes from the BFE solar model and scales with how much roof area a municipality has.