Skip to main content
Ranking · Data 2025 · Source: BFS

The greatest solar potential per capita in canton Ticino

National ranking

Campo (Vallemaggia) has the greatest solar potential per capita in canton Ticino: its roofs could generate about 88'936 kWh of electricity a year per inhabitant. Next come Bosco/Gurin (58'837 kWh) and Bedretto (42'414 kWh). Per capita, small municipalities with lots of roof area — barns and sheds — lead, not the big cities. Source: BFE/FSO.

Ranking

BFE + BFS · 2025
RankMunicipalitySolar potential per capitaResidents
1Campo (Vallemaggia)88'936 kWh47
2Bosco/Gurin58'837 kWh43
3Bedretto42'414 kWh116
4Cerentino40'000 kWh39
5Mergoscia30'206 kWh194
6Ronco sopra Ascona26'395 kWh516
7Grancia26'389 kWh457
8Onsernone26'019 kWh643
9Lavizzara25'556 kWh504
10Muzzano23'677 kWh775
11Airolo23'555 kWh1'443
12Brione sopra Minusio23'426 kWh432
13Verzasca23'311 kWh749
14Dalpe22'766 kWh188
15Quinto21'598 kWh1'289
16Stabio21'361 kWh4'518
17Blenio21'027 kWh1'752
18Linescio20'000 kWh42
19Faido19'760 kWh2'706
20Manno19'218 kWh1'381
21Mezzovico-Vira19'175 kWh1'418
22Brissago18'415 kWh1'577
23Orselina17'845 kWh682
24Balerna17'763 kWh3'415
25Isone17'543 kWh407
26Novazzano17'486 kWh2'339
27Centovalli16'883 kWh1'049
28Acquarossa16'693 kWh1'781
29Bioggio16'577 kWh2'802
30Vico Morcote16'457 kWh398
31Sant'Antonino16'407 kWh2'655
32Gambarogno16'293 kWh4'977
33Morcote15'595 kWh681
34Serravalle14'332 kWh2'052
35Bedano14'097 kWh1'501
36Tresa13'861 kWh3'147
37Breggia13'355 kWh1'842
38Neggio13'012 kWh322
39Cadenazzo12'937 kWh3'139
40Brusino Arsizio12'934 kWh467
41Castel San Pietro12'923 kWh2'241
42Alto Malcantone12'620 kWh1'374
43Lavertezzo12'583 kWh1'235
44Avegno Gordevio12'439 kWh1'525
45Arogno12'385 kWh931
46Mendrisio12'359 kWh15'076
47Cademario11'747 kWh784
48Cevio11'597 kWh1'083
49Ascona11'531 kWh5'290
50Magliaso11'479 kWh1'609
51Personico11'438 kWh320
52Maggia11'080 kWh2'686
53Monteceneri10'853 kWh4'746
54Lamone10'772 kWh1'748
55Torricella-Taverne10'569 kWh3'128
56Aranno10'431 kWh348
57Cugnasco-Gerra10'356 kWh2'838
58Porza10'254 kWh1'696
59Pura10'175 kWh1'368
60Vernate10'146 kWh618
61Riviera10'012 kWh4'262
62Riva San Vitale9'974 kWh2'740
63Terre di Pedemonte9'834 kWh2'646
64Coldrerio9'708 kWh2'838
65Collina d'Oro9'519 kWh4'932
66Comano9'458 kWh2'194
67Gordola9'223 kWh4'877
68Tesserete9'045 kWh6'702
69Losone8'945 kWh6'780
70Biasca8'854 kWh6'213
71Cadempino8'688 kWh1'601
72Val Mara8'530 kWh3'048
73Lumino8'516 kWh1'712
74Origlio8'507 kWh1'534
75Tenero-Contra8'341 kWh3'417
76Gravesano8'340 kWh1'416
77Morbio Inferiore7'940 kWh4'437
78Agno7'916 kWh4'582
79Arbedo-Castione7'895 kWh5'211
80Bellinzona7'816 kWh45'828
81Giornico7'797 kWh1'761
82Vezia7'772 kWh1'957
83Pollegio7'769 kWh919
84Caslano7'726 kWh4'393
85Cureglia7'446 kWh1'484
86Locarno7'116 kWh16'463
87Chiasso6'960 kWh7'677
88Canobbio6'879 kWh2'403
89Minusio6'832 kWh7'273
90Ponte Capriasca6'631 kWh1'965
91Sorengo6'391 kWh2'153
92Muralto6'371 kWh2'513
93Savosa6'354 kWh2'315
94Vacallo6'289 kWh3'511
95Bissone6'201 kWh945
96Lugano5'714 kWh63'691
97Melide5'585 kWh1'812
98Massagno2'807 kWh6'976
99Paradiso2'484 kWh4'806
Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE), retrieved 31.08.2026

How we measure this

BFE + BFS

Modelled annual rooftop electricity yield (BFE solar model, 2025 snapshot) divided by the permanent resident population (FSO STATPOP), in kilowatt-hours per year per inhabitant. For scale: an ElCom reference household (profile H4) uses 4,500 kWh a year. It is a potential, not installed capacity or actual generation. Per capita the absolute ranking inverts: small municipalities with large barn and shed roofs lead, not the cities with the most total roof area.

Frequently asked questions

Which municipality in canton Ticino has the greatest solar potential per capita?
Campo (Vallemaggia): its roofs could generate about 88'936 kWh of electricity a year per inhabitant (2025) — the greatest modelled per-capita potential of any municipality in canton Ticino.
Why do small municipalities lead rather than the cities?
Because the roof potential is divided by the number of inhabitants: few residents with large barn, shed and stable roofs produce high per-capita values. Big cities have the greatest absolute potential but little roof area per person. The figure remains modelled potential, not today's generation.