Skip to main content
Canton Ticino overview
Ranking · Data 2015–2026 · Source: BFS

Municipalities in Ticino that most often vote against the Swiss result

National ranking

Lema is the municipality in Ticino that most often ends up on the opposite side of the national result: on 32% of federal ballot proposals (2015–2026) its own majority differed from Switzerland. Next are Centovalli (31.3%) and Serravalle (31%). Only municipalities of at least 1,000 residents are counted. Source: FSO.

Ranking

BFS · 2015–2026
RankMunicipalityDivergenceResidents
1Lema32%2'667
2Centovalli31.3%1'049
3Serravalle31%2'052
4Tresa30%3'147
5Giornico29%1'761
6Val Mara29%3'048
7Mezzovico-Vira28.3%1'418
8Biasca28.3%6'213
9Acquarossa28%1'781
10Blenio28%1'752
11Canobbio28%2'403
12Balerna27.3%3'415
13Cadenazzo27%3'139
14Faido27%2'706
15Gravesano27%1'416
16Paradiso27%4'806
17Chiasso27%7'677
18Breggia27%1'842
19Sant'Antonino26%2'655
20Airolo26%1'443
21Brissago26%1'577
22Cadempino26%1'601
23Monteceneri26%4'746
24Morbio Inferiore26%4'437
25Riviera26%4'262
26Losone25%6'780
27Bedano25%1'501
28Lamone25%1'748
29Tesserete25%6'702
30Castel San Pietro25%2'241
31Novazzano25%2'339
32Magliaso24.2%1'609
33Quinto24%1'289
34Muralto24%2'513
35Agno24%4'582
36Pura24%1'368
37Torricella-Taverne24%3'128
38Alto Malcantone24%1'374
39Cevio24%1'083
40Arbedo-Castione23%5'211
41Cugnasco-Gerra23%2'838
42Caslano23%4'393
43Coldrerio23%2'838
44Riva San Vitale23%2'740
45Stabio23%4'518
46Maggia23%2'686
47Avegno Gordevio23%1'525
48Gordola22%4'877
49Lavertezzo22%1'235
50Tenero-Contra22%3'417
51Lugano22%63'691
52Melide22%1'812
53Savosa22%2'315
54Vacallo22%3'511
55Gambarogno22%4'977
56Locarno21%16'463
57Bioggio21%2'802
58Mendrisio21%15'076
59Bellinzona20%45'828
60Lumino20%1'712
61Ascona19%5'290
62Manno19%1'381
63Origlio19%1'534
64Vezia19%1'957
65Cureglia18%1'484
66Ponte Capriasca18%1'965
67Terre di Pedemonte17.2%2'646
68Porza17%1'696
69Collina d'Oro17%4'932
70Massagno16.2%6'976
71Minusio15%7'273
72Comano15%2'194
73Sorengo11%2'153
Popular votes (sd-t-17-02) 2015–2026 · Federal Statistical Office (FSO), retrieved 03.08.2026

How we measure this

BFS

Share of federal ballot proposals (2015–2026) on which the municipality's own majority landed on the opposite side of the Swiss-wide result (yes vs no). Based on the FSO ballot results across every proposal in the period; only municipalities that took part in at least 50 proposals are ranked. Municipal ties (exactly 50%) count neither for nor against. Only municipalities of at least 1,000 residents appear: in very small municipalities a few votes can flip the majority, so genuine political distinctiveness could not be reliably separated from chance. The top ranks are nonetheless not an artefact — the municipalities involved diverge deeply (around 20 percentage points) and in a consistent direction, not narrowly and at random.

Frequently asked questions

Which municipality in Ticino votes against Switzerland most often?
Lema: on 32% of federal ballot proposals (2015–2026) its majority landed on the opposite side of the national result — the highest in Ticino (municipalities of 1,000+ residents).
Aren't these just small villages with random results?
No. That is why only municipalities of at least 1,000 residents are counted, and the leaders diverge not narrowly but sharply — on average about 20 percentage points from the 50% line, and systematically in the same direction (they reject what Switzerland accepts). That is a real political pattern, not the statistical noise of a few ballots.