Skip to main content
Ranking · Data 2025 · Source: BFS

The greatest solar potential per capita in canton Basel-Landschaft

National ranking

Roggenburg has the greatest solar potential per capita in canton Basel-Landschaft: its roofs could generate about 19'504 kWh of electricity a year per inhabitant. Next come Hemmiken (17'224 kWh) and Liesberg (15'285 kWh). Per capita, small municipalities with lots of roof area — barns and sheds — lead, not the big cities. Source: BFE/FSO.

Ranking

BFE + BFS · 2025
RankMunicipalitySolar potential per capitaResidents
1Roggenburg19'504 kWh242
2Hemmiken17'224 kWh263
3Liesberg15'285 kWh1'124
4Eptingen14'974 kWh569
5Häfelfingen14'563 kWh252
6Zeglingen14'243 kWh535
7Oltingen12'524 kWh523
8Anwil12'347 kWh554
9Wenslingen12'031 kWh704
10Wintersingen11'925 kWh587
11Kilchberg11'694 kWh183
12Bennwil11'590 kWh673
13Liedertswil11'457 kWh151
14Wittinsburg11'162 kWh456
15Bretzwil11'068 kWh740
16Titterten10'986 kWh436
17Läufelfingen10'761 kWh1'419
18Langenbruck10'751 kWh985
19Rümlingen10'432 kWh440
20Rickenbach10'317 kWh567
21Lauwil10'288 kWh347
22Buus10'257 kWh1'127
23Maisprach9'969 kWh972
24Diegten9'824 kWh1'645
25Buckten9'708 kWh719
26Arisdorf9'624 kWh1'703
27Rünenberg9'575 kWh800
28Rothenfluh9'493 kWh809
29Nenzlingen9'418 kWh464
30Böckten9'417 kWh857
31Brislach9'071 kWh1'777
32Känerkinden8'979 kWh529
33Blauen8'957 kWh729
34Arboldswil8'885 kWh583
35Ormalingen8'798 kWh2'420
36Lampenberg8'785 kWh576
37Ziefen8'500 kWh1'740
38Zwingen8'423 kWh2'828
39Tenniken8'414 kWh933
40Nusshof8'351 kWh285
41Augst8'228 kWh1'140
42Dittingen7'930 kWh739
43Niederdorf7'866 kWh1'823
44Bubendorf7'806 kWh4'572
45Reigoldswil7'791 kWh1'639
46Füllinsdorf7'517 kWh4'804
47Pratteln7'464 kWh16'595
48Biel-Benken7'448 kWh3'550
49Ramlinsburg7'442 kWh739
50Laufen7'347 kWh6'065
51Sissach7'193 kWh6'964
52Röschenz7'179 kWh1'960
53Seltisberg7'038 kWh1'357
54Schönenbuch6'986 kWh1'503
55Duggingen6'936 kWh1'648
56Hersberg6'865 kWh386
57Münchenstein6'670 kWh12'662
58Wahlen6'479 kWh1'653
59Itingen6'431 kWh2'477
60Gelterkinden6'376 kWh6'531
61Hölstein6'294 kWh2'669
62Muttenz6'263 kWh18'308
63Oberdorf6'250 kWh2'579
64Zunzgen6'108 kWh2'788
65Tecknau5'822 kWh821
66Lupsingen5'798 kWh1'554
67Liestal5'755 kWh16'081
68Grellingen5'691 kWh2'012
69Arlesheim5'606 kWh9'309
70Waldenburg5'442 kWh1'132
71Pfeffingen5'440 kWh2'432
72Oberwil5'422 kWh11'459
73Aesch5'363 kWh11'327
74Diepflingen5'327 kWh856
75Thürnen5'243 kWh1'482
76Therwil4'960 kWh10'141
77Burg im Leimental4'946 kWh279
78Giebenach4'937 kWh1'183
79Frenkendorf4'883 kWh6'756
80Ettingen4'876 kWh5'625
81Birsfelden4'850 kWh10'401
82Lausen4'730 kWh5'996
83Reinach4'392 kWh21'003
84Bottmingen4'367 kWh7'007
85Allschwil4'102 kWh22'374
86Binningen3'582 kWh16'245
Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE), retrieved 31.08.2026

How we measure this

BFE + BFS

Modelled annual rooftop electricity yield (BFE solar model, 2025 snapshot) divided by the permanent resident population (FSO STATPOP), in kilowatt-hours per year per inhabitant. For scale: an ElCom reference household (profile H4) uses 4,500 kWh a year. It is a potential, not installed capacity or actual generation. Per capita the absolute ranking inverts: small municipalities with large barn and shed roofs lead, not the cities with the most total roof area.

Frequently asked questions

Which municipality in canton Basel-Landschaft has the greatest solar potential per capita?
Roggenburg: its roofs could generate about 19'504 kWh of electricity a year per inhabitant (2025) — the greatest modelled per-capita potential of any municipality in canton Basel-Landschaft.
Why do small municipalities lead rather than the cities?
Because the roof potential is divided by the number of inhabitants: few residents with large barn, shed and stable roofs produce high per-capita values. Big cities have the greatest absolute potential but little roof area per person. The figure remains modelled potential, not today's generation.