#	Municipality	Yes share	Canton
1	Mauraz	92.9%	VD
2	Lovatens	83.7%	VD
3	Clarmont	83.1%	VD
4	Dizy	79.0%	VD
5	Moiry	77.9%	VD
6	Romainmôtier-Envy	76.7%	VD
7	Avully	76.4%	GE
8	Tévenon	76.2%	VD
9	Vuiteboeuf	75.7%	VD
10	Corbeyrier	75.3%	VD

Result by district

yes share per district — the district figures BFS publishes; cantons without districts stay neutral

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by district

BFS

District de Lausanne VD71.7%

District de l'Ouest lausannois VD66.1%

District du Jura-Nord vaudois VD66.1%

District des Franches-Montagnes JU62.8%

District de la Riviera-Pays-d'Enhaut VD62.7%

Strongest no by district

BFS

Wahlkreis Entlebuch LU81.8%

Bezirk Höfe SZ80.1%

Region Bernina GR78.4%

Bezirk Gäu SO77.7%

Wahlkreis Willisau LU77.6%

Result by district

District results as published by the FSO — top 10 yes / top 10 no

#	District	Yes share	Canton
1	District de Lausanne	71.7%	VD
2	District de l'Ouest lausannois	66.1%	VD
3	District du Jura-Nord vaudois	66.1%	VD
4	District des Franches-Montagnes	62.8%	JU
5	District de la Riviera-Pays-d'Enhaut	62.7%	VD
6	District d'Aigle	61.9%	VD
7	District de Morges	61.8%	VD
8	District du Gros-de-Vaud	61.5%	VD
9	District de Lavaux-Oron	61.4%	VD
10	District de Nyon	60.4%	VD

How the cantons voted

yes share per municipality

This Vorlage needed a majority of the people AND a majority of the cantons. Six cantons count as a half (BV Art. 142).

4 of 23 cantons — Rejected

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by canton

BFS

Geneva63.9%

Vaud63.8%

Jura58.9%

Neuchâtel57.1%

Fribourg48.7%

Strongest no by canton

BFS

Obwalden79.6%

Nidwalden77.5%

Schwyz77.4%

Appenzell Innerrhoden76.7%

Uri74.2%

Result by canton

#	Canton	Yes share	Turnout	Municipalities
1	Geneva	63.9%	45.4%	45
2	Vaud	63.8%	42.4%	300
3	Jura	58.9%	31.9%	51
4	Neuchâtel	57.1%	36.2%	24
5	Fribourg	48.7%	34.7%	119
6	Basel-City	42.8%	48.2%	3
7	Ticino	42.7%	41.8%	100
8	Valais	38.5%	36.7%	122
9	Bern	36.8%	33.4%	328
10	Zurich	35.3%	42.5%	160
11	Schaffhausen	34.4%	62.5%	26
12	Basel-Landschaft	33.5%	35.1%	86
13	Glarus	32.9%	29.1%	3
14	Appenzell Ausserrhoden	32.6%	39.4%	20
15	Solothurn	31.2%	36.0%	104
16	St. Gallen	29.8%	36.8%	75
17	Grisons	29.6%	38.4%	100
18	Lucerne	28.9%	38.3%	79
19	Thurgau	28.9%	37.5%	80
20	Aargau	28.8%	36.0%	196
21	Zug	27.4%	45.1%	11
22	Uri	25.8%	29.9%	19
23	Appenzell Innerrhoden	23.3%	31.2%	5
24	Schwyz	22.6%	37.9%	30
25	Nidwalden	22.5%	39.7%	11
26	Obwalden	20.4%	42.2%	7

Federal Council explanations

The Federal Council publishes its official explanations in German, French and Italian only; there is no English edition, and we do not translate them.

Source: Federal Council explanations (Federal Chancellery), chapter «In Kürze» · Official page (German)

Frequently asked questions

What was the result of the vote “Federal Popular Initiative ‘For healthy, environmentally-friendly food fairly produced (Fair Food Initiative)’”?: On 23.09.2018, “Federal Popular Initiative ‘For healthy, environmentally-friendly food fairly produced (Fair Food Initiative)’” was rejected with 774'821 yes and 1'227'326 no. Turnout was 37.9%.
How did the cantons vote on “Federal Popular Initiative ‘For healthy, environmentally-friendly food fairly produced (Fair Food Initiative)’”?: The strongest yes came from Geneva (63.9%), the strongest no from Obwalden (20.4%).
Was “Federal Popular Initiative ‘For healthy, environmentally-friendly food fairly produced (Fair Food Initiative)’” accepted?: “Federal Popular Initiative ‘For healthy, environmentally-friendly food fairly produced (Fair Food Initiative)’” was rejected nationwide on 23.09.2018.