The greatest solar potential per capita in canton Jura
National ranking →Ederswiler has the greatest solar potential per capita in canton Jura: its roofs could generate about 35'495 kWh of electricity a year per inhabitant. Next come Fahy (34'573 kWh) and Bourrignon (33'205 kWh). Per capita, small municipalities with lots of roof area — barns and sheds — lead, not the big cities. Source: BFE/FSO.
Ranking
BFE + BFS · 2025| Rank | Municipality | Solar potential per capita | Residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ederswiler | 35'495 kWh | 111 |
| 2 | Fahy | 34'573 kWh | 328 |
| 3 | Bourrignon | 33'205 kWh | 259 |
| 4 | Soubey | 31'626 kWh | 123 |
| 5 | Le Bémont | 31'304 kWh | 299 |
| 6 | Haute-Ajoie | 30'254 kWh | 1'063 |
| 7 | Grandfontaine | 27'956 kWh | 362 |
| 8 | Bure | 27'652 kWh | 660 |
| 9 | Pleigne | 27'283 kWh | 368 |
| 10 | Les Enfers | 26'966 kWh | 145 |
| 11 | Basse-Vendline | 26'356 kWh | 741 |
| 12 | Damphreux-Lugnez | 26'197 kWh | 376 |
| 13 | Saint-Brais | 25'202 kWh | 248 |
| 14 | Muriaux | 24'776 kWh | 513 |
| 15 | Boncourt | 23'934 kWh | 1'159 |
| 16 | Montfaucon | 23'929 kWh | 565 |
| 17 | La Baroche | 23'274 kWh | 1'124 |
| 18 | Les Genevez | 20'656 kWh | 518 |
| 19 | Clos du Doubs | 19'977 kWh | 1'289 |
| 20 | Vendlincourt | 19'801 kWh | 554 |
| 21 | Saulcy | 19'708 kWh | 274 |
| 22 | Basse-Allaine | 19'323 kWh | 1'182 |
| 23 | Mettembert | 18'257 kWh | 109 |
| 24 | Movelier | 18'199 kWh | 422 |
| 25 | Lajoux | 17'697 kWh | 712 |
| 26 | Coeuve | 16'444 kWh | 720 |
| 27 | Courgenay | 15'916 kWh | 2'463 |
| 28 | Courchavon | 15'904 kWh | 332 |
| 29 | Alle | 15'272 kWh | 1'965 |
| 30 | Develier | 14'667 kWh | 1'397 |
| 31 | Les Bois | 14'607 kWh | 1'246 |
| 32 | Les Breuleux | 13'826 kWh | 1'631 |
| 33 | Courchapoix | 13'684 kWh | 456 |
| 34 | Saignelégier | 13'675 kWh | 2'528 |
| 35 | Courtedoux | 13'511 kWh | 749 |
| 36 | Boécourt | 13'148 kWh | 953 |
| 37 | Cornol | 13'022 kWh | 1'082 |
| 38 | Mervelier | 12'983 kWh | 523 |
| 39 | Fontenais | 12'906 kWh | 1'645 |
| 40 | Val Terbi | 12'515 kWh | 3'240 |
| 41 | Le Noirmont | 12'397 kWh | 1'936 |
| 42 | Haute-Sorne | 10'636 kWh | 7'532 |
| 43 | Châtillon | 9'860 kWh | 500 |
| 44 | Courroux | 9'709 kWh | 3'439 |
| 45 | Porrentruy | 9'504 kWh | 6'597 |
| 46 | Rossemaison | 9'244 kWh | 767 |
| 47 | Soyhières | 9'046 kWh | 461 |
| 48 | Courrendlin | 8'948 kWh | 3'737 |
| 49 | Courtételle | 8'804 kWh | 2'784 |
| 50 | Delémont | 8'209 kWh | 12'991 |
How we measure this
BFE + BFSModelled annual rooftop electricity yield (BFE solar model, 2025 snapshot) divided by the permanent resident population (FSO STATPOP), in kilowatt-hours per year per inhabitant. For scale: an ElCom reference household (profile H4) uses 4,500 kWh a year. It is a potential, not installed capacity or actual generation. Per capita the absolute ranking inverts: small municipalities with large barn and shed roofs lead, not the cities with the most total roof area.
Frequently asked questions
- Which municipality in canton Jura has the greatest solar potential per capita?
- Ederswiler: its roofs could generate about 35'495 kWh of electricity a year per inhabitant (2025) — the greatest modelled per-capita potential of any municipality in canton Jura.
- Why do small municipalities lead rather than the cities?
- Because the roof potential is divided by the number of inhabitants: few residents with large barn, shed and stable roofs produce high per-capita values. Big cities have the greatest absolute potential but little roof area per person. The figure remains modelled potential, not today's generation.