#	Municipality	Yes share	Canton
1	Bern	59.4%	BE
2	Lausanne	55.7%	VD
3	Mauraz	55.2%	VD
4	Vevey	55.0%	VD
5	Saint-Saphorin	52.3%	VD
6	Fribourg	51.1%	FR
7	Lajoux	50.9%	JU
8	Les Enfers	50.8%	JU
9	Romainmôtier-Envy	50.6%	VD
10	Chavannes-près-Renens	49.4%	VD

Result by district

yes share per district — the district figures BFS publishes; cantons without districts stay neutral

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by district

BFS

District de Lausanne VD51.6%

Bezirk Zürich ZH49.1%

Wahlkreis Luzern-Stadt LU42.4%

District de l'Ouest lausannois VD42.2%

District de la Riviera-Pays-d'Enhaut VD40.6%

Strongest no by district

BFS

Wahlkreis Entlebuch LU88.0%

Wahlkreis Willisau LU86.6%

Bezirk Höfe SZ85.5%

Bezirk Thal SO85.4%

Bezirk March SZ85.3%

Result by district

District results as published by the FSO — top 10 yes / top 10 no

#	District	Yes share	Canton
1	District de Lausanne	51.6%	VD
2	Bezirk Zürich	49.1%	ZH
3	Wahlkreis Luzern-Stadt	42.4%	LU
4	District de l'Ouest lausannois	42.2%	VD
5	District de la Riviera-Pays-d'Enhaut	40.6%	VD
6	Bezirk Solothurn	40.5%	SO
7	Verwaltungskreis Bern-Mittelland	39.7%	BE
8	District des Franches-Montagnes	37.5%	JU
9	District de la Sarine	37.4%	FR
10	Verwaltungskreis Biel/Bienne	37.1%	BE

How the cantons voted

yes share per municipality

This Vorlage needed a majority of the people AND a majority of the cantons. Six cantons count as a half (BV Art. 142).

0 of 23 cantons — Rejected

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by canton

BFS

Basel-City44.6%

Geneva42.1%

Vaud38.4%

Neuchâtel37.6%

Jura33.6%

Strongest no by canton

BFS

Schwyz84.5%

Appenzell Innerrhoden84.4%

Nidwalden82.7%

Obwalden82.5%

Uri79.9%

Result by canton

#	Canton	Yes share	Turnout	Municipalities
1	Basel-City	44.6%	62.7%	3
2	Geneva	42.1%	57.5%	45
3	Vaud	38.4%	63.9%	300
4	Neuchâtel	37.6%	51.2%	24
5	Jura	33.6%	48.3%	51
6	Zurich	32.7%	61.3%	160
7	Bern	31.1%	54.6%	329
8	Fribourg	29.3%	58.2%	119
9	Schaffhausen	29.1%	74.1%	26
10	Ticino	28.8%	60.2%	100
11	Basel-Landschaft	27.9%	54.9%	86
12	Solothurn	24.8%	55.1%	104
13	Lucerne	24.3%	58.8%	79
14	Aargau	23.9%	56.0%	196
15	Grisons	23.2%	55.4%	100
16	Valais	23.1%	55.2%	122
17	St. Gallen	22.2%	56.4%	75
18	Zug	22.1%	60.9%	11
19	Appenzell Ausserrhoden	21.8%	58.7%	20
20	Glarus	21.2%	51.5%	3
21	Thurgau	20.6%	57.4%	80
22	Uri	20.1%	51.2%	19
23	Obwalden	17.5%	62.9%	7
24	Nidwalden	17.3%	61.8%	11
25	Appenzell Innerrhoden	15.6%	54.3%	5
26	Schwyz	15.5%	60.5%	30

Federal Council explanations

The Federal Council publishes its official explanations in German, French and Italian only; there is no English edition, and we do not translate them.

Source: Federal Council explanations (Federal Chancellery), chapter «In Kürze» · Official page (German)

Text put to the vote

BBl 2025 2888

Text put to the vote on Fedlex (BBl 2025 2888, German)

Source: Fedlex, BBl 2025 2888 — official text

Frequently asked questions

What was the result of the vote “Popular Initiative ‘For a fair energy and climate policy: Investing for prosperity, jobs and the environment (Climate Fund Initiative)’”?: On 08.03.2026, “Popular Initiative ‘For a fair energy and climate policy: Investing for prosperity, jobs and the environment (Climate Fund Initiative)’” was rejected with 897'355 yes and 2'165'868 no. Turnout was 57.6%.
How did the cantons vote on “Popular Initiative ‘For a fair energy and climate policy: Investing for prosperity, jobs and the environment (Climate Fund Initiative)’”?: The strongest yes came from Basel-City (44.6%), the strongest no from Schwyz (15.5%).
Was “Popular Initiative ‘For a fair energy and climate policy: Investing for prosperity, jobs and the environment (Climate Fund Initiative)’” accepted?: “Popular Initiative ‘For a fair energy and climate policy: Investing for prosperity, jobs and the environment (Climate Fund Initiative)’” was rejected nationwide on 08.03.2026.