#	Municipality	Yes share	Canton
1	Courtedoux	88.3%	JU
2	Campo (Vallemaggia)	81.5%	TI
3	Lajoux	79.0%	JU
4	Châtillon	78.8%	JU
5	Cornol	78.3%	JU
6	Saignelégier	78.0%	JU
7	Corcelles	77.3%	BE
8	Fontenais	77.1%	JU
9	Romainmôtier-Envy	77.0%	VD
10	Cerentino	76.9%	TI

Result by district

yes share per district — the district figures BFS publishes; cantons without districts stay neutral

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by district

BFS

District de Moutier JU73.3%

District de Delémont JU73.1%

District des Franches-Montagnes JU72.9%

District de Porrentruy JU70.1%

District de Lausanne VD69.4%

Strongest no by district

BFS

Bezirk Höfe SZ77.1%

Wahlkreis Entlebuch LU74.3%

Bezirk Küssnacht (SZ)SZ73.9%

Bezirk Einsiedeln SZ73.2%

Bezirk Meilen ZH72.5%

Result by district

District results as published by the FSO — top 10 yes / top 10 no

#	District	Yes share	Canton
1	District de Moutier	73.3%	JU
2	District de Delémont	73.1%	JU
3	District des Franches-Montagnes	72.9%	JU
4	District de Porrentruy	70.1%	JU
5	District de Lausanne	69.4%	VD
6	District de l'Ouest lausannois	67.3%	VD
7	Arrondissement administratif Jura bernois	65.1%	BE
8	District du Jura-Nord vaudois	63.5%	VD
9	District d'Aigle	63.3%	VD
10	District de Saint-Maurice	62.3%	VS

How the cantons voted

yes share per municipality

This Vorlage needed a majority of the people AND a majority of the cantons. Six cantons count as a half (BV Art. 142).

7.5 of 23 cantons — Rejected

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by canton

BFS

Jura72.1%

Neuchâtel69.5%

Geneva61.7%

Vaud60.5%

Ticino57.6%

Strongest no by canton

BFS

Appenzell Innerrhoden80.0%

Obwalden76.3%

Nidwalden74.1%

Zug72.4%

Schwyz72.3%

Result by canton

#	Canton	Yes share	Turnout	Municipalities
1	Jura	72.1%	44.2%	51
2	Neuchâtel	69.5%	44.1%	24
3	Geneva	61.7%	53.1%	45
4	Vaud	60.5%	49.6%	300
5	Ticino	57.6%	51.5%	100
6	Fribourg	55.0%	44.8%	119
7	Basel-City	54.2%	56.3%	3
8	Valais	52.3%	47.1%	122
9	Bern	46.5%	43.3%	329
10	Schaffhausen	43.7%	67.6%	26
11	Basel-Landschaft	43.5%	48.4%	86
12	Solothurn	42.9%	45.0%	104
13	Zurich	38.9%	49.1%	160
14	Glarus	36.0%	42.0%	3
15	Grisons	34.4%	41.2%	100
16	Aargau	34.1%	43.8%	196
17	St. Gallen	33.8%	43.2%	75
18	Thurgau	33.7%	44.7%	80
19	Lucerne	33.3%	45.4%	79
20	Appenzell Ausserrhoden	30.4%	48.0%	20
21	Uri	30.1%	34.2%	19
22	Schwyz	27.7%	48.0%	30
23	Zug	27.6%	52.5%	11
24	Nidwalden	25.9%	46.7%	11
25	Obwalden	23.7%	48.6%	7
26	Appenzell Innerrhoden	20.0%	41.6%	5

Federal Council explanations

The Federal Council publishes its official explanations in German, French and Italian only; there is no English edition, and we do not translate them.

Source: Federal Council explanations (Federal Chancellery), chapter «In Kürze» · Official page (German)

Text put to the vote

BBl 2023 2285

Text put to the vote on Fedlex (BBl 2023 2285, German)

Source: Fedlex, BBl 2023 2285 — official text

Frequently asked questions

What was the result of the vote “Popular initiative ‘Keep health insurance premiums to no more than 10% of income (Premium Relief Initiative)’”?: On 09.06.2024, “Popular initiative ‘Keep health insurance premiums to no more than 10% of income (Premium Relief Initiative)’” was rejected with 1'117'095 yes and 1'391'645 no. Turnout was 46.3%.
How did the cantons vote on “Popular initiative ‘Keep health insurance premiums to no more than 10% of income (Premium Relief Initiative)’”?: The strongest yes came from Jura (72.1%), the strongest no from Appenzell Innerrhoden (20.0%).
Was “Popular initiative ‘Keep health insurance premiums to no more than 10% of income (Premium Relief Initiative)’” accepted?: “Popular initiative ‘Keep health insurance premiums to no more than 10% of income (Premium Relief Initiative)’” was rejected nationwide on 09.06.2024.