Schaffhausen · 24.11.2024
Amendment to the Code of Obligations (tenancy law: termination to permit personal use)
47.3% YesNo 52.7%
Yes
47.3%
Turnout
64.9%Switzerland 44.9%
Schaffhausen was 1.1 points more in favour than the national result
Rank 17 of 26 cantons by yes share
Municipalities in Schaffhausen
yes share per municipalityNoYesNo result
| # | Municipality | Yes share |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beggingen | 64.5% |
| 2 | Buchberg | 61.0% |
| 3 | Wilchingen | 60.4% |
| 4 | Merishausen | 60.1% |
| 5 | Löhningen | 59.9% |
| 6 | Stetten | 59.9% |
| 7 | Oberhallau | 59.3% |
| 8 | Buch | 59.2% |
| 9 | Büttenhardt | 59.0% |
| 10 | Schleitheim | 58.9% |
Result by district
yes share per district — the district figures BFS publishes; cantons without districts stay neutralNoYesNo result
Bezirk Schleitheim58.8%
Bezirk Unterklettgau57.4%
Bezirk Oberklettgau56.1%
Bezirk Reiat55.0%
Bezirk Stein53.5%
Bezirk Schaffhausen57.6%
Bezirk Stein46.5%
Bezirk Reiat45.0%
Bezirk Oberklettgau43.9%
Bezirk Unterklettgau42.6%
Result by district
District results as published by the FSO — top 10 yes / top 10 no| # | District | Yes share |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bezirk Schleitheim | 58.8% |
| 2 | Bezirk Unterklettgau | 57.4% |
| 3 | Bezirk Oberklettgau | 56.1% |
| 4 | Bezirk Reiat | 55.0% |
| 5 | Bezirk Stein | 53.5% |
| 6 | Bezirk Schaffhausen | 42.4% |