#	Municipality	Yes share	Canton
1	Buseno	86.2%	GR
2	Furna	77.5%	GR
3	Homberg	76.8%	BE
4	Eriz	76.7%	BE
5	Bedretto	76.5%	TI
6	Saas-Fee	75.9%	VS
7	Gurbrü	75.0%	BE
8	Zermatt	74.2%	VS
9	Zwischbergen	74.1%	VS
10	Treytorrens	73.8%	VD

Result by district

yes share per district — the district figures BFS publishes; cantons without districts stay neutral

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by district

BFS

Verwaltungskreis Obersimmental-Saanen BE66.1%

Region Bernina GR63.6%

Bezirk Höfe SZ62.9%

Bezirk Visp VS62.2%

Wahlkreis Entlebuch LU62.2%

Strongest no by district

BFS

District de Lausanne VD77.8%

Bezirk Zürich ZH73.2%

District de l'Ouest lausannois VD70.2%

Wahlkreis Luzern-Stadt LU69.2%

District de Moutier JU69.0%

Result by district

District results as published by the FSO — top 10 yes / top 10 no

#	District	Yes share	Canton
1	Verwaltungskreis Obersimmental-Saanen	66.1%	BE
2	Region Bernina	63.6%	GR
3	Bezirk Höfe	62.9%	SZ
4	Bezirk Visp	62.2%	VS
5	Wahlkreis Entlebuch	62.2%	LU
6	Wahlkreis Sarganserland	61.4%	SG
7	Verwaltungskreis Frutigen-Niedersimmental	61.1%	BE
8	Distretto di Leventina	60.9%	TI
9	Distretto di Blenio	59.9%	TI
10	Wahlkreis Toggenburg	59.8%	SG

Strongest yes by canton

BFS

Appenzell Innerrhoden60.6%

Obwalden59.2%

Schwyz59.1%

Nidwalden57.2%

Uri56.7%

Strongest no by canton

BFS

Geneva67.8%

Basel-City65.9%

Neuchâtel64.3%

Jura61.1%

Vaud60.5%

Result by canton

#	Canton	Yes share	Turnout	Municipalities
1	Appenzell Innerrhoden	60.6%	40.8%	5
2	Obwalden	59.2%	43.9%	7
3	Schwyz	59.1%	44.0%	30
4	Nidwalden	57.2%	45.1%	11
5	Uri	56.7%	50.2%	19
6	Appenzell Ausserrhoden	55.5%	47.0%	20
7	Grisons	54.9%	39.5%	100
8	Valais	54.3%	44.5%	122
9	St. Gallen	54.1%	44.6%	75
10	Thurgau	54.1%	44.1%	80
11	Glarus	53.4%	36.8%	3
12	Zug	53.0%	52.2%	11
13	Ticino	52.5%	42.1%	100
14	Aargau	51.2%	41.3%	196
15	Lucerne	48.6%	43.9%	79
16	Basel-Landschaft	47.8%	44.2%	86
17	Schaffhausen	47.3%	64.9%	26
18	Solothurn	46.3%	43.1%	104
19	Fribourg	45.2%	41.5%	119
20	Bern	45.0%	43.0%	329
21	Zurich	42.7%	48.6%	160
22	Vaud	39.5%	51.4%	300
23	Jura	38.9%	40.9%	51
24	Neuchâtel	35.7%	40.0%	24
25	Basel-City	34.1%	61.2%	3
26	Geneva	32.2%	53.9%	45

Federal Council explanations

The Federal Council publishes its official explanations in German, French and Italian only; there is no English edition, and we do not translate them.

Source: Federal Council explanations (Federal Chancellery), chapter «In Kürze» · Official page (German)

Text put to the vote

BBl 2023 2291

Text put to the vote on Fedlex (BBl 2023 2291, German)

Source: Fedlex, BBl 2023 2291 — official text

Frequently asked questions

What was the result of the vote “Amendment to the Code of Obligations (tenancy law: termination to permit personal use)”?: On 24.11.2024, “Amendment to the Code of Obligations (tenancy law: termination to permit personal use)” was rejected with 1'141'693 yes and 1'331'134 no. Turnout was 44.9%.
How did the cantons vote on “Amendment to the Code of Obligations (tenancy law: termination to permit personal use)”?: The strongest yes came from Appenzell Innerrhoden (60.6%), the strongest no from Geneva (32.2%).
Was “Amendment to the Code of Obligations (tenancy law: termination to permit personal use)” accepted?: “Amendment to the Code of Obligations (tenancy law: termination to permit personal use)” was rejected nationwide on 24.11.2024.