#	Municipality	Yes share	Canton
1	Schelten	55.6%	BE
2	Bern	50.8%	BE
3	Les Enfers	50.0%	JU
4	Romainmôtier-Envy	49.0%	VD
5	Mauraz	47.8%	VD
6	Lausanne	47.8%	VD
7	Moiry	47.4%	VD
8	Lajoux	46.9%	JU
9	Vevey	45.8%	VD
10	Fribourg	44.1%	FR

Result by district

yes share per district — the district figures BFS publishes; cantons without districts stay neutral

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by district

BFS

District de Lausanne VD42.9%

Bezirk Zürich ZH41.5%

District des Franches-Montagnes JU34.7%

District de l'Ouest lausannois VD33.7%

District de la Sarine FR33.5%

Strongest no by district

BFS

Bezirk Höfe SZ92.4%

Bezirk March SZ91.6%

Wahlkreis Entlebuch LU91.1%

Bezirk Visp VS90.7%

Bezirk Thal SO90.5%

Result by district

District results as published by the FSO — top 10 yes / top 10 no

#	District	Yes share	Canton
1	District de Lausanne	42.9%	VD
2	Bezirk Zürich	41.5%	ZH
3	District des Franches-Montagnes	34.7%	JU
4	District de l'Ouest lausannois	33.7%	VD
5	District de la Sarine	33.5%	FR
6	Wahlkreis Luzern-Stadt	32.4%	LU
7	District de Moutier	32.4%	JU
8	Verwaltungskreis Bern-Mittelland	30.8%	BE
9	Bezirk Solothurn	30.2%	SO
10	District de la Riviera-Pays-d'Enhaut	30.0%	VD

How the cantons voted

yes share per municipality

This Vorlage needed a majority of the people AND a majority of the cantons. Six cantons count as a half (BV Art. 142).

0 of 23 cantons — Rejected

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by canton

BFS

Basel-City33.4%

Geneva31.9%

Neuchâtel31.4%

Vaud29.3%

Jura29.3%

Strongest no by canton

BFS

Appenzell Innerrhoden91.0%

Schwyz90.6%

Nidwalden89.3%

Obwalden88.9%

Zug86.6%

Result by canton

#	Canton	Yes share	Turnout	Municipalities
1	Basel-City	33.4%	52.3%	3
2	Geneva	31.9%	47.3%	45
3	Neuchâtel	31.4%	37.7%	24
4	Vaud	29.3%	46.3%	300
5	Jura	29.3%	34.9%	51
6	Fribourg	25.4%	42.0%	119
7	Zurich	25.2%	48.4%	160
8	Bern	23.7%	40.7%	329
9	Schaffhausen	21.6%	68.6%	26
10	Ticino	20.6%	41.5%	100
11	Basel-Landschaft	19.4%	41.7%	86
12	Solothurn	17.3%	40.5%	104
13	Grisons	17.3%	43.5%	100
14	Lucerne	17.2%	46.3%	79
15	Appenzell Ausserrhoden	16.6%	49.6%	20
16	Valais	16.5%	42.4%	122
17	Aargau	15.7%	43.0%	196
18	Uri	15.3%	41.6%	19
19	St. Gallen	15.0%	42.4%	75
20	Glarus	14.7%	38.0%	3
21	Thurgau	13.5%	44.3%	80
22	Zug	13.4%	51.4%	11
23	Obwalden	11.1%	53.0%	7
24	Nidwalden	10.7%	48.7%	11
25	Schwyz	9.4%	49.6%	30
26	Appenzell Innerrhoden	9.0%	43.6%	5

Federal Council explanations

The Federal Council publishes its official explanations in German, French and Italian only; there is no English edition, and we do not translate them.

Source: Federal Council explanations (Federal Chancellery), chapter «In Kürze» · Official page (German)

Text put to the vote

BBl 2025 2026

Text put to the vote on Fedlex (BBl 2025 2026, German)

Source: Fedlex, BBl 2025 2026 — official text

Frequently asked questions

What was the result of the vote “Popular Initiative 'For a social climate policy – financed fairly through taxation (Initiative for a Future)'”?: On 30.11.2025, “Popular Initiative 'For a social climate policy – financed fairly through taxation (Initiative for a Future)'” was rejected with 520'173 yes and 1'874'301 no. Turnout was 43.6%.
How did the cantons vote on “Popular Initiative 'For a social climate policy – financed fairly through taxation (Initiative for a Future)'”?: The strongest yes came from Basel-City (33.4%), the strongest no from Appenzell Innerrhoden (9.0%).
Was “Popular Initiative 'For a social climate policy – financed fairly through taxation (Initiative for a Future)'” accepted?: “Popular Initiative 'For a social climate policy – financed fairly through taxation (Initiative for a Future)'” was rejected nationwide on 30.11.2025.