What was the result of the vote “Supplementary financing of OASI by increasing Value Added Tax”?

#	Municipality	Yes share	Canton
1	Blatten	78.1%	VS
2	Gottlieben	74.8%	TG
3	Sufers	74.1%	GR
4	Obergoms	73.9%	VS
5	Uitikon	73.5%	ZH
6	Erlenbach	73.3%	ZH
7	Ringgenberg	72.5%	BE
8	Zumikon	72.5%	ZH
9	Feldbrunnen-St. Niklaus	72.5%	SO
10	Saas-Fee	72.4%	VS

Result by district

yes share per district — the district figures BFS publishes; cantons without districts stay neutral

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by district

BFS

Bezirk Meilen ZH68.7%

Bezirk Küssnacht (SZ)SZ67.2%

Region Maloja GR66.1%

Bezirk Höfe SZ65.9%

Wahlkreis Sursee LU64.9%

Strongest no by district

BFS

District de Moutier JU66.0%

District des Franches-Montagnes JU65.9%

District de Delémont JU63.2%

District de Lausanne VD62.8%

District de l'Ouest lausannois VD60.6%

Result by district

District results as published by the FSO — top 10 yes / top 10 no

#	District	Yes share	Canton
1	Bezirk Meilen	68.7%	ZH
2	Bezirk Küssnacht (SZ)	67.2%	SZ
3	Region Maloja	66.1%	GR
4	Bezirk Höfe	65.9%	SZ
5	Wahlkreis Sursee	64.9%	LU
6	Bezirk Horgen	64.5%	ZH
7	Bezirk Gersau	64.4%	SZ
8	Bezirk Mittelland	63.7%	AR
9	Wahlkreis Luzern-Land	63.3%	LU
10	Bezirk Affoltern	63.3%	ZH

How the cantons voted

yes share per municipality

This Vorlage needed a majority of the people AND a majority of the cantons. Six cantons count as a half (BV Art. 142).

18 of 23 cantons — Accepted

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by canton

BFS

Zug67.0%

Nidwalden65.6%

Appenzell Innerrhoden62.5%

Lucerne62.3%

Obwalden61.4%

Strongest no by canton

BFS

Jura62.6%

Geneva57.4%

Neuchâtel54.7%

Vaud54.4%

Fribourg51.8%

Result by canton

#	Canton	Yes share	Turnout	Municipalities
1	Zug	67.0%	58.8%	11
2	Nidwalden	65.6%	56.8%	11
3	Appenzell Innerrhoden	62.5%	54.7%	5
4	Lucerne	62.3%	60.6%	79
5	Obwalden	61.4%	59.3%	7
6	Thurgau	60.6%	55.7%	80
7	Schwyz	60.5%	58.4%	30
8	Zurich	60.3%	54.6%	160
9	Appenzell Ausserrhoden	59.8%	57.7%	20
10	St. Gallen	59.5%	53.7%	75
11	Grisons	58.5%	50.7%	100
12	Aargau	58.4%	51.9%	196
13	Uri	58.3%	52.1%	19
14	Basel-Landschaft	55.4%	53.9%	86
15	Glarus	55.2%	45.9%	3
16	Bern	54.9%	55.5%	329
17	Schaffhausen	54.7%	71.4%	26
18	Solothurn	52.9%	53.3%	104
19	Basel-City	51.6%	59.9%	3
20	Ticino	50.7%	54.3%	100
21	Valais	50.4%	52.9%	122
22	Fribourg	48.2%	56.7%	119
23	Vaud	45.6%	60.4%	300
24	Neuchâtel	45.3%	55.0%	24
25	Geneva	42.6%	55.7%	45
26	Jura	37.4%	56.1%	51

Federal Council explanations

The Federal Council publishes its official explanations in German, French and Italian only; there is no English edition, and we do not translate them.

Source: Federal Council explanations (Federal Chancellery), chapter «In Kürze» · Official page (German)

Text put to the vote

BBl 2021 2991

Text put to the vote on Fedlex (BBl 2021 2991, German)

Source: Fedlex, BBl 2021 2991 — official text

Frequently asked questions

What was the result of the vote “Supplementary financing of OASI by increasing Value Added Tax”?: On 25.09.2022, “Supplementary financing of OASI by increasing Value Added Tax” was accepted with 1'570'813 yes and 1'281'447 no. Turnout was 55.5%.
How did the cantons vote on “Supplementary financing of OASI by increasing Value Added Tax”?: The strongest yes came from Zug (67.0%), the strongest no from Jura (37.4%).
Was “Supplementary financing of OASI by increasing Value Added Tax” accepted?: “Supplementary financing of OASI by increasing Value Added Tax” was accepted nationwide on 25.09.2022.