#	Municipality	Yes share	Canton
1	Schelten	57.1%	BE
2	Fahy	51.0%	JU
3	Saint-Brais	50.0%	JU
4	Sorvilier	49.1%	BE
5	Vernier	47.6%	GE
6	Campo (Vallemaggia)	47.4%	TI
7	Onex	46.1%	GE
8	Geneva	45.9%	GE
9	Carouge	45.5%	GE
10	Avully	45.3%	GE

Result by district

yes share per district — the district figures BFS publishes; cantons without districts stay neutral

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by district

BFS

Bezirk Vorderland AR32.9%

Bezirk Zürich ZH29.6%

Bezirk Schaffhausen SH29.0%

District des Franches-Montagnes JU28.6%

Wahlkreis Luzern-Stadt LU28.3%

Strongest no by district

BFS

Wahlkreis Entlebuch LU86.7%

Region Bernina GR85.3%

Verwaltungskreis Obersimmental-Saanen BE84.4%

Bezirk Gäu SO84.0%

Bezirk Küssnacht (SZ)SZ83.6%

Result by district

District results as published by the FSO — top 10 yes / top 10 no

#	District	Yes share	Canton
1	Bezirk Vorderland	32.9%	AR
2	Bezirk Zürich	29.6%	ZH
3	Bezirk Schaffhausen	29.0%	SH
4	District des Franches-Montagnes	28.6%	JU
5	Wahlkreis Luzern-Stadt	28.3%	LU
6	District de Delémont	28.1%	JU
7	District de Lausanne	27.8%	VD
8	Bezirk Dorneck	27.7%	SO
9	Bezirk Kreuzlingen	27.6%	TG
10	Bezirk Winterthur	27.6%	ZH

How the cantons voted

yes share per municipality

This Vorlage needed a majority of the people AND a majority of the cantons. Six cantons count as a half (BV Art. 142).

0 of 23 cantons — Rejected

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by canton

BFS

Geneva40.3%

Basel-City29.7%

Appenzell Ausserrhoden27.7%

Jura27.4%

Schaffhausen27.2%

Strongest no by canton

BFS

Obwalden82.1%

Nidwalden82.0%

Schwyz81.0%

Uri79.9%

Grisons79.7%

Result by canton

#	Canton	Yes share	Turnout	Municipalities
1	Geneva	40.3%	40.7%	45
2	Basel-City	29.7%	46.4%	3
3	Appenzell Ausserrhoden	27.7%	31.6%	20
4	Jura	27.4%	25.8%	51
5	Schaffhausen	27.2%	64.1%	26
6	Neuchâtel	26.0%	29.8%	24
7	Thurgau	25.3%	28.4%	80
8	Fribourg	25.0%	28.3%	119
9	Ticino	25.0%	35.5%	100
10	Zurich	24.7%	34.8%	160
11	St. Gallen	24.0%	31.6%	75
12	Valais	24.0%	61.8%	122
13	Basel-Landschaft	23.9%	31.5%	86
14	Bern	23.2%	26.2%	328
15	Glarus	22.0%	31.5%	3
16	Zug	21.7%	40.3%	11
17	Aargau	21.6%	30.0%	196
18	Solothurn	21.5%	38.0%	104
19	Vaud	21.3%	36.2%	300
20	Lucerne	21.2%	34.5%	79
21	Appenzell Innerrhoden	20.7%	23.5%	5
22	Grisons	20.3%	39.8%	100
23	Uri	20.1%	23.0%	19
24	Schwyz	19.0%	35.7%	30
25	Nidwalden	18.0%	34.2%	11
26	Obwalden	17.9%	32.8%	7

Federal Council explanations

The Federal Council publishes its official explanations in German, French and Italian only; there is no English edition, and we do not translate them.

Source: Federal Council explanations (Federal Chancellery), chapter «» · Federal Council explanations (PDF, German)

Text put to the vote

BBl 2017 7895

Text put to the vote on Fedlex (BBl 2017 7895, German)

Source: Fedlex, BBl 2017 7895 — official text

Frequently asked questions

What was the result of the vote “Popular initiative ‘For crisis-safe money: Money creation by the National Bank only! (Sovereign Money Initiative)’”?: On 10.06.2018, “Popular initiative ‘For crisis-safe money: Money creation by the National Bank only! (Sovereign Money Initiative)’” was rejected with 442'387 yes and 1'379'540 no. Turnout was 34.4%.
How did the cantons vote on “Popular initiative ‘For crisis-safe money: Money creation by the National Bank only! (Sovereign Money Initiative)’”?: The strongest yes came from Geneva (40.3%), the strongest no from Obwalden (17.9%).
Was “Popular initiative ‘For crisis-safe money: Money creation by the National Bank only! (Sovereign Money Initiative)’” accepted?: “Popular initiative ‘For crisis-safe money: Money creation by the National Bank only! (Sovereign Money Initiative)’” was rejected nationwide on 10.06.2018.