Popular vote · 08.03.2026Federal ballot
Cash Initiative and Counter-Proposal: Deciding Question
Votes202637.4% YesNo 62.6%
Votes
Rejected
Yes
37.4% 1'098'341
No
62.6% 1'841'208
Cantonal majority
2 / 23
Turnout
57.4%
Ballot-weighted result across 2'117 municipalities
Result by municipality
yes share per municipalityNoYesNo result
Strongest no
BFSResult by municipality
Top 10| # | Municipality | Yes share | Canton |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mex | 93.4% | VD |
| 2 | Lutzenberg | 92.3% | AR |
| 3 | Centovalli | 82.4% | TI |
| 4 | Horrenbach-Buchen | 81.0% | BE |
| 5 | Linescio | 76.9% | TI |
| 6 | Ederswiler | 76.7% | JU |
| 7 | Wachseldorn | 76.4% | BE |
| 8 | Unteriberg | 75.4% | SZ |
| 9 | Alpthal | 74.0% | SZ |
| 10 | Campo (Vallemaggia) | 73.3% | TI |
Result by district
yes share per district — the district figures BFS publishes; cantons without districts stay neutralNoYesNo result
Bezirk GersauSZ69.8%
Result by district
District results as published by the FSO — top 10 yes / top 10 no| # | District | Yes share | Canton |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bezirk Gersau | 69.8% | SZ |
| 2 | Distretto di Blenio | 58.2% | TI |
| 3 | Distretto di Riviera | 57.1% | TI |
| 4 | District de Moutier | 55.7% | JU |
| 5 | District de Monthey | 55.0% | VS |
| 6 | Region Moesa | 55.0% | GR |
| 7 | Distretto di Leventina | 54.8% | TI |
| 8 | District de Porrentruy | 54.7% | JU |
| 9 | District d'Hérens | 54.6% | VS |
| 10 | District de Saint-Maurice | 54.2% | VS |
How the cantons voted
yes share per municipalityThis Vorlage needed a majority of the people AND a majority of the cantons. Six cantons count as a half (BV Art. 142).
2 of 23 cantons — Rejected
NoYesNo result
| # | Canton | Yes share | Turnout | Municipalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ticino | 52.6% | 60.0% | 100 |
| 2 | Jura | 52.4% | 47.9% | 51 |
| 3 | Valais | 49.1% | 54.9% | 122 |
| 4 | Neuchâtel | 48.6% | 51.0% | 24 |
| 5 | Schwyz | 46.1% | 60.2% | 30 |
| 6 | Fribourg | 44.7% | 57.7% | 119 |
| 7 | Uri | 43.2% | 50.0% | 19 |
| 8 | Glarus | 42.2% | 51.3% | 3 |
| 9 | Schaffhausen | 41.8% | 74.0% | 26 |
| 10 | Appenzell Innerrhoden | 40.6% | 53.7% | 5 |
| 11 | Thurgau | 40.2% | 57.1% | 80 |
| 12 | St. Gallen | 39.8% | 56.0% | 75 |
| 13 | Appenzell Ausserrhoden | 39.6% | 58.5% | 20 |
| 14 | Obwalden | 39.2% | 62.3% | 7 |
| 15 | Solothurn | 38.7% | 54.7% | 104 |
| 16 | Grisons | 37.8% | 54.6% | 100 |
| 17 | Geneva | 37.4% | 57.5% | 45 |
| 18 | Aargau | 37.0% | 55.6% | 196 |
| 19 | Nidwalden | 36.8% | 61.7% | 11 |
| 20 | Basel-Landschaft | 36.7% | 54.8% | 86 |
| 21 | Bern | 35.2% | 54.6% | 329 |
| 22 | Zug | 34.3% | 60.5% | 11 |
| 23 | Lucerne | 33.9% | 58.4% | 79 |
| 24 | Zurich | 32.6% | 61.2% | 160 |
| 25 | Vaud | 29.5% | 64.0% | 300 |
| 26 | Basel-City | 29.3% | 62.7% | 3 |
The Federal Council publishes its official explanations in German, French and Italian only; there is no English edition, and we do not translate them.
Source: Federal Council explanations (Federal Chancellery), chapter «Stichfrage» · Federal Council explanations (PDF, German)
- What was the result of the vote “Cash Initiative and Counter-Proposal: Deciding Question”?
- On 08.03.2026, “Cash Initiative and Counter-Proposal: Deciding Question” was rejected with 1'098'341 yes and 1'841'208 no. Turnout was 57.4%.
- How did the cantons vote on “Cash Initiative and Counter-Proposal: Deciding Question”?
- The strongest yes came from Ticino (52.6%), the strongest no from Basel-City (29.3%).
- Was “Cash Initiative and Counter-Proposal: Deciding Question” accepted?
- “Cash Initiative and Counter-Proposal: Deciding Question” was rejected nationwide on 08.03.2026.