#	Municipality	Yes share	Canton
1	Kammersrohr	82.4%	SO
2	Rivaz	82.2%	VD
3	Bern	81.8%	BE
4	Lausanne	80.8%	VD
5	Troinex	79.7%	GE
6	Fribourg	79.2%	FR
7	Vevey	78.8%	VD
8	Villars-sur-Glâne	78.4%	FR
9	Lussy-sur-Morges	77.7%	VD
10	Neuchâtel	77.4%	NE

Result by district

yes share per district — the district figures BFS publishes; cantons without districts stay neutral

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by district

BFS

District de Lausanne VD79.1%

Bezirk Zürich ZH77.4%

Wahlkreis Luzern-Stadt LU73.6%

Bezirk Solothurn SO73.4%

District de la Riviera-Pays-d'Enhaut VD72.7%

Strongest no by district

BFS

Verwaltungskreis Obersimmental-Saanen BE63.0%

Bezirk Schleitheim SH62.3%

Bezirk Kulm AG61.6%

Bezirk Schwyz SZ60.6%

Bezirk Einsiedeln SZ59.8%

Result by district

District results as published by the FSO — top 10 yes / top 10 no

#	District	Yes share	Canton
1	District de Lausanne	79.1%	VD
2	Bezirk Zürich	77.4%	ZH
3	Wahlkreis Luzern-Stadt	73.6%	LU
4	Bezirk Solothurn	73.4%	SO
5	District de la Riviera-Pays-d'Enhaut	72.7%	VD
6	District de la Sarine	71.4%	FR
7	District de l'Ouest lausannois	71.4%	VD
8	District de Lavaux-Oron	70.4%	VD
9	District de Nyon	69.8%	VD
10	District de Morges	68.2%	VD

Strongest yes by canton

BFS

Geneva74.5%

Basel-City73.3%

Neuchâtel69.9%

Vaud69.5%

Jura63.0%

Strongest no by canton

BFS

Schwyz57.5%

Uri56.9%

Obwalden56.1%

Glarus54.0%

Appenzell Innerrhoden53.5%

Result by canton

#	Canton	Yes share	Turnout	Municipalities
1	Geneva	74.5%	47.2%	45
2	Basel-City	73.3%	52.7%	3
3	Neuchâtel	69.9%	38.5%	24
4	Vaud	69.5%	45.5%	300
5	Jura	63.0%	34.1%	51
6	Zurich	62.5%	47.0%	160
7	Fribourg	61.9%	39.3%	119
8	Lucerne	59.0%	42.3%	79
9	Bern	58.5%	42.3%	329
10	Zug	57.6%	51.5%	11
11	Basel-Landschaft	57.2%	44.0%	86
12	Grisons	55.5%	40.6%	100
13	Valais	55.4%	41.2%	122
14	Ticino	54.8%	41.2%	100
15	Solothurn	52.9%	41.3%	104
16	Schaffhausen	52.1%	65.0%	26
17	Aargau	52.1%	42.0%	196
18	St. Gallen	52.0%	42.1%	75
19	Appenzell Ausserrhoden	50.9%	47.1%	20
20	Thurgau	49.3%	43.1%	80
21	Nidwalden	46.8%	48.8%	11
22	Appenzell Innerrhoden	46.5%	37.9%	5
23	Glarus	46.0%	40.7%	3
24	Obwalden	43.9%	49.6%	7
25	Uri	43.1%	40.5%	19
26	Schwyz	42.5%	49.1%	30

Federal Council explanations

The Federal Council publishes its official explanations in German, French and Italian only; there is no English edition, and we do not translate them.

Source: Federal Council explanations (Federal Chancellery), chapter «In Kürze» · Official page (German)

Text put to the vote

BBl 2022 2403

Text put to the vote on Fedlex (BBl 2022 2403, German)

Source: Fedlex, BBl 2022 2403 — official text

Frequently asked questions

What was the result of the vote “Federal Act on Climate Protection Targets, Innovation and Strengthening Energy Security (KIG)”?: On 18.06.2023, “Federal Act on Climate Protection Targets, Innovation and Strengthening Energy Security (KIG)” was accepted with 1'380'974 yes and 957'077 no. Turnout was 43.0%.
How did the cantons vote on “Federal Act on Climate Protection Targets, Innovation and Strengthening Energy Security (KIG)”?: The strongest yes came from Geneva (74.5%), the strongest no from Schwyz (42.5%).
Was “Federal Act on Climate Protection Targets, Innovation and Strengthening Energy Security (KIG)” accepted?: “Federal Act on Climate Protection Targets, Innovation and Strengthening Energy Security (KIG)” was accepted nationwide on 18.06.2023.