What was the result of the vote “Volksinitiative «AHVplus: für eine starke AHV»”?

#	Municipality	Yes share	Canton
1	Mettembert	77.6%	JU
2	Villeneuve	74.6%	VD
3	Fontenais	70.3%	JU
4	Lajoux	69.6%	JU
5	L'Abergement	69.4%	VD
6	Centovalli	68.2%	TI
7	Sorvilier	68.0%	BE
8	Santa Maria in Calanca	66.7%	GR
9	Courchapoix	66.7%	JU
10	Basse-Vendline	66.7%	JU

How the cantons voted

yes share per municipality

This Vorlage needed a majority of the people AND a majority of the cantons. Six cantons count as a half (BV Art. 142).

5 of 23 cantons — Rejected

NoYesNo result

BFS

Jura59.5%

Vaud50.3%

BFS

Zug71.4%

#	Canton	Yes share	Turnout	Municipalities
1	Jura	59.5%	38.6%	50
2	Neuchâtel	54.0%	47.2%	24
3	Geneva	53.6%	50.7%	45
4	Ticino	53.4%	46.9%	100
5	Vaud	50.3%	48.7%	300
6	Basel-City	49.1%	53.4%	3
7	Fribourg	42.8%	41.0%	121
8	Basel-Landschaft	42.2%	40.9%	86
9	Schaffhausen	41.2%	65.4%	26
10	Valais	41.0%	45.7%	122
11	Solothurn	40.8%	41.1%	106
12	Bern	39.8%	37.9%	328
13	Zurich	38.3%	45.8%	160
14	Glarus	36.9%	33.1%	3
15	Aargau	36.3%	39.5%	197
16	Grisons	34.5%	38.7%	100
17	Appenzell Ausserrhoden	34.0%	42.9%	20
18	Thurgau	33.6%	39.1%	80
19	St. Gallen	33.2%	47.4%	75
20	Lucerne	30.8%	40.1%	79
21	Uri	30.3%	35.6%	19
22	Zug	28.6%	49.3%	11
23	Schwyz	28.2%	45.3%	30
24	Nidwalden	27.0%	42.4%	11
25	Obwalden	24.9%	44.7%	7
26	Appenzell Innerrhoden	22.3%	34.2%	5

What was the result of the vote “Volksinitiative «AHVplus: für eine starke AHV»”?: On 25.09.2016, “Volksinitiative «AHVplus: für eine starke AHV»” was rejected with 921'351 yes and 1'347'981 no. Turnout was 42.9%.
How did the cantons vote on “Volksinitiative «AHVplus: für eine starke AHV»”?: The strongest yes came from Jura (59.5%), the strongest no from Appenzell Innerrhoden (22.3%).
Was “Volksinitiative «AHVplus: für eine starke AHV»” accepted?: “Volksinitiative «AHVplus: für eine starke AHV»” was rejected nationwide on 25.09.2016.