Compare

Stans vs Zug: municipalities compared

Every figure we hold for Stans and Zug, side by side. Shading marks the order along each metric’s documented ranking direction — the judgment is yours.

	Stans Canton NW	Zug Canton ZG
Population & demographics
Foreign residents↑	2.18.3%#1'015 CH #6 NW	1.37.3%#111 CH #1 ZG
Children & youth (0–19)↑	2.17.8%#1'695 CH #7 NW	1.19.1%#1'418 CH #9 ZG
Residents 65+↑	1.23.3%#614 CH #6 NW	2.18.4%#1'566 CH #8 ZG
Density↑	2.773/km²#318 CH #1 NW	1.950/km²#241 CH #4 ZG
Residents↑	2.8'565#232 CH #1 NW	1.32'160#25 CH #1 ZG
Women↑	1.50.1%#860 CH #1 NW	2.48.6%#1'676 CH #9 ZG
Taxes
Tax↓	2.11'325#163 CH #9 NW	1.5'321#3 CH #3 ZG
Climate
Avg. temp.↑	2.9.7°C#785 CH #5 NW	1.9.8°C#699 CH #6 ZG
Sunshine↑	1.42.8%#1'024 CH #7 NW	2.40.9%#1'446 CH #11 ZG
Precipitation↑	1.1'297 mm#496 CH #5 NW	2.1'270 mm#542 CH #7 ZG
Politics & elections
Turnout↑	2.60%#479 CH #7 NW	1.62.1%#312 CH #3 ZG
Divergence↑	1.10%#1'220 CH #11 NW	1.10%#1'223 CH #11 ZG
Agreement↑	1.90%#231 CH #1 NW	1.90%#234 CH #2 ZG
SVP strength↑	1.29.4%#1'300 CH #11 NW	2.25%#1'552 CH #11 ZG
SP strength↑	–	1.7.2%#1'764 CH #1 ZG
Centre strength↑	1.53.5%#58 CH #3 NW	2.20.5%#503 CH #11 ZG
FDP strength↑	1.17.1%#649 CH #4 NW	2.15.2%#801 CH #1 ZG
GLP strength↑	–	1.7.1%#725 CH #2 ZG
Green strength↑	–	1.19.6%#25 CH #1 ZG
Geography
Area↑	2.11.1 km²#886 CH #11 NW	1.33.8 km²#271 CH #2 ZG
Elevation↑	2.452 m#1'519 CH #7 NW	1.611 m#785 CH #6 ZG
PT travel time↓	2.94 min#1'625 CH #2 NW	1.54 min#590 CH #1 ZG
Terrain & relief
Highest point↑	1.1'783 m#394 CH #8 NW	2.1'566 m#442 CH #1 ZG
Mean elevation↑	1.668 m#835 CH #8 NW	2.580 m#1'092 CH #6 ZG
Vertical range↑	1.1'347 m#371 CH #8 NW	2.1'155 m#420 CH #1 ZG
Mean slope↑	1.17.2°#486 CH #8 NW	2.8.3°#1'082 CH #6 ZG
Energy & electricity
Roof potential↑	2.57 GWh#261 CH #1 NW	1.120 GWh#54 CH #2 ZG
Tariff H4↓	2.22.06 Rp./kWh#40 CH #8 NW	1.21.88 Rp./kWh#31 CH #7 ZG

Add more municipalities to this comparison