#	Municipality	Yes share	Canton
1	Santa Maria in Calanca	45.8%	GR
2	Zumikon	44.9%	ZH
3	Feldbrunnen-St. Niklaus	43.9%	SO
4	Herrliberg	43.6%	ZH
5	Küsnacht	43.1%	ZH
6	Erlenbach	42.9%	ZH
7	Zollikon	42.3%	ZH
8	Vernate	42.2%	TI
9	Horrenbach-Buchen	40.7%	BE
10	Bütschwil-Ganterschwil	39.9%	SG

How the cantons voted

yes share per municipality

This Vorlage needed a majority of the people AND a majority of the cantons. Six cantons count as a half (BV Art. 142).

0 of 23 cantons — Rejected

NoYesNo result

Strongest yes by canton

BFS

Zug30.1%

BFS

Vaud85.1%

Jura84.9%

#	Canton	Yes share	Turnout	Municipalities
1	Zurich	30.5%	62.1%	160
2	Zug	30.1%	65.7%	11
3	Schaffhausen	29.8%	73.3%	26
4	Appenzell Innerrhoden	29.3%	58.1%	5
5	Schwyz	29.2%	64.1%	30
6	Nidwalden	28.2%	63.4%	11
7	Basel-City	27.8%	66.8%	3
8	Appenzell Ausserrhoden	27.4%	60.0%	20
9	Obwalden	27.2%	64.8%	7
10	Lucerne	27.1%	59.9%	79
11	St. Gallen	26.8%	58.5%	75
12	Thurgau	26.8%	57.4%	80
13	Basel-Landschaft	26.7%	60.8%	86
14	Grisons	26.5%	56.5%	100
15	Aargau	26.2%	58.5%	196
16	Solothurn	25.8%	60.4%	104
17	Bern	24.9%	58.0%	329
18	Glarus	24.9%	56.3%	3
19	Ticino	24.6%	60.0%	100
20	Valais	23.8%	65.5%	122
21	Uri	22.8%	62.0%	19
22	Geneva	22.2%	60.2%	45
23	Fribourg	19.6%	61.3%	119
24	Neuchâtel	18.5%	59.5%	24
25	Jura	15.1%	61.5%	51
26	Vaud	14.9%	63.6%	300

What was the result of the vote “Volksinitiative «Für eine sichere und nachhaltige Altersvorsorge (Renteninitiative)»”?: On 03.03.2024, “Volksinitiative «Für eine sichere und nachhaltige Altersvorsorge (Renteninitiative)»” was rejected with 808'578 yes and 2'393'930 no. Turnout was 60.5%.
How did the cantons vote on “Volksinitiative «Für eine sichere und nachhaltige Altersvorsorge (Renteninitiative)»”?: The strongest yes came from Zurich (30.5%), the strongest no from Vaud (14.9%).
Was “Volksinitiative «Für eine sichere und nachhaltige Altersvorsorge (Renteninitiative)»” accepted?: “Volksinitiative «Für eine sichere und nachhaltige Altersvorsorge (Renteninitiative)»” was rejected nationwide on 03.03.2024.