The greatest solar potential per capita in canton Uri
National ranking →Realp has the greatest solar potential per capita in canton Uri: its roofs could generate about 37'707 kWh of electricity a year per inhabitant. Next come Hospental (28'580 kWh) and Spiringen (18'429 kWh). Per capita, small municipalities with lots of roof area — barns and sheds — lead, not the big cities. Source: BFE/FSO.
Ranking
BFE + BFS · 2025| Rank | Municipality | Solar potential per capita | Residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Realp | 37'707 kWh | 157 |
| 2 | Hospental | 28'580 kWh | 176 |
| 3 | Spiringen | 18'429 kWh | 872 |
| 4 | Unterschächen | 16'323 kWh | 737 |
| 5 | Andermatt | 14'716 kWh | 1'603 |
| 6 | Wassen | 12'565 kWh | 425 |
| 7 | Gurtnellen | 11'277 kWh | 501 |
| 8 | Seelisberg | 10'428 kWh | 724 |
| 9 | Göschenen | 10'373 kWh | 482 |
| 10 | Isenthal | 8'612 kWh | 461 |
| 11 | Bürglen | 7'836 kWh | 3'923 |
| 12 | Schattdorf | 7'593 kWh | 5'555 |
| 13 | Silenen | 6'957 kWh | 2'080 |
| 14 | Flüelen | 5'791 kWh | 2'048 |
| 15 | Attinghausen | 5'772 kWh | 1'781 |
| 16 | Sisikon | 5'564 kWh | 399 |
| 17 | Altdorf | 5'257 kWh | 10'618 |
| 18 | Erstfeld | 5'257 kWh | 3'985 |
| 19 | Seedorf | 5'093 kWh | 2'054 |
How we measure this
BFE + BFSModelled annual rooftop electricity yield (BFE solar model, 2025 snapshot) divided by the permanent resident population (FSO STATPOP), in kilowatt-hours per year per inhabitant. For scale: an ElCom reference household (profile H4) uses 4,500 kWh a year. It is a potential, not installed capacity or actual generation. Per capita the absolute ranking inverts: small municipalities with large barn and shed roofs lead, not the cities with the most total roof area.
Frequently asked questions
- Which municipality in canton Uri has the greatest solar potential per capita?
- Realp: its roofs could generate about 37'707 kWh of electricity a year per inhabitant (2025) — the greatest modelled per-capita potential of any municipality in canton Uri.
- Why do small municipalities lead rather than the cities?
- Because the roof potential is divided by the number of inhabitants: few residents with large barn, shed and stable roofs produce high per-capita values. Big cities have the greatest absolute potential but little roof area per person. The figure remains modelled potential, not today's generation.